{"id":2053,"date":"2021-06-02T06:43:23","date_gmt":"2021-06-02T06:43:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/?p=2053"},"modified":"2021-06-02T06:43:23","modified_gmt":"2021-06-02T06:43:23","slug":"trafik-kazasindan-kaynaklanan-destekten-yoksun-kalma-tazminati-istemine-iliskin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/trafik-kazasindan-kaynaklanan-destekten-yoksun-kalma-tazminati-istemine-iliskin\/","title":{"rendered":"Trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkin"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkin<br>davada; deste\u011fin veya hak sahiplerinin bakiye \u00f6m\u00fcrleri, daha \u00f6nceki y\u0131llarda<br>Fransa&#8217;dan al\u0131nan 1931 tarihli &#8220;PMF&#8221; cetvelleri ile saptanmakta ise de; Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k<br>Hazine M\u00fcste\u015farl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Hacettepe \u00dcniversitesi Fen Fak\u00fcltesi Akt\u00fcerya Bilimleri B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc,<br>BNB Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k, Marmara \u00dcniversitesi ve Ba\u015fkent \u00dcniversitesi&#8217;nin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131yla<br>&#8220;TRH 2010&#8221; ad\u0131 veriler, &#8220;Ulusal Mortalite Tablosu&#8221; haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f olup, Sosyal<br>Kurumu\u2019nca da ilk pe\u015fin sermaye de\u011ferlerinin hesab\u0131nda an\u0131lan tablolar\u0131n<br>uygulanmas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi\u011fi, ger\u00e7ek zarar hesab\u0131 \u00f6z\u00fc itibariyle varsay\u0131mlara dayal\u0131 bir<br>hesap olup, ger\u00e7e\u011fe en yak\u0131n verilerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n esas oldu\u011fu, bu durumda; di\u011fer<br>kurumlar ile Yarg\u0131tay Daireleri aras\u0131nda tazminat hesab\u0131nda birli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131<br>a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ve yine bu tablonun \u00fclkemize \u00f6zg\u00fc ve g\u00fcncel verileri i\u00e7ermesi de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne<br>al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 2020 y\u0131l\u0131 Aral\u0131k ay\u0131 itibari ile tazminat hesaplar\u0131nda bakiye \u00f6mr\u00fcn<br>belirlenmesinde TRH 2010 tablosunun esas al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcncellenen \u00fclke ger\u00e7eklerine<br>daha uygun olaca\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi-<\/strong><br><br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dava: Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki sigorta tahkim davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda; Sigorta<br>Tahkim komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem heyetince verilen karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz<br>edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br><br>Karar: Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131ya trafik sigortal\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kusurlu hareketi ile<br>ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen kazada m\u00fcvekkilinin deste\u011finin \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p fazlaya dair haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131<br>kalmak kayd\u0131 ile 5.500,00 TL&#8217;nin tahsilini talep etmi\u015f, \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talebini 196.408,00<br>TL&#8217;ye y\u00fckseltmi\u015ftir.<br><br>Daval\u0131 vekili, talebin reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<br><br>Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakemince, iddia, savunma ve toplanan kan\u0131tlara<br>g\u00f6re; taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak 5.500.0 0TL&#8217;nin tahsiline karar verilmi\u015f, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz<br>edilmesi \u00fczerine \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince ba\u015fvuru sahibi vekilinin itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Hakem<br>Heyetince verilen karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ba\u015fvurunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile 147.666.00 TL.nin<br>tahsiline karar verilmi\u015f; karar, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<br><br>1-Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 19.06.2020 tarih, 2019\/4-2019\/1<br>say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 5684 say\u0131l\u0131 Sigortac\u0131l\u0131k Kanunu&#8217;nun 30. maddesi ile kurulan Sigorta Tahkim<br>Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetinin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin faaliyete ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131<br>20.07.2016 tarihinden sonra itiraz \u00fczerine verilen kararlar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz kanun yoluna tabi<br>oldu\u011fu kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 40.Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin<br>12.12.2019 tarih, 2019\/516-685 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak daval\u0131 vekilinin Sigorta Tahkim<br>Komisyonu itiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.<br><br>2-Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin<br>tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131<br>vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, karar<br>vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br>3-Dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir.<br>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin deste\u011finin meydana gelen kazada \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p destekten<br>yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015f, tazminat\u0131n belirlenmesi amac\u0131 ile bilirki\u015fiden<br>rapor al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, al\u0131nan raporda davac\u0131n\u0131n ve deste\u011fin kaza tarihinden sonraki muhtemel ya\u015fam<br>s\u00fcresi belirlenmesinde 1931 tarihli PMF ya\u015fam tablosu dikkate al\u0131narak hesaplama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f,<br>hakem heyetince bu rapor h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br><br>Ger\u00e7ek zarar miktar\u0131; hak sahiplerinin ve deste\u011fin olay tarihindeki bakiye \u00f6mr\u00fc esas al\u0131narak<br>aktif ve pasif d\u00f6nemde elde edece\u011fi kazan\u00e7lar toplam\u0131ndan olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r.<br><br>Deste\u011fin veya hak sahiplerinin bakiye \u00f6m\u00fcrleri daha \u00f6nceki y\u0131llarda Fransa&#8217;dan al\u0131nan 1931<br>tarihli &#8220;PMF&#8221; cetvelleri ile saptanmakta ise de; Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k Hazine M\u00fcste\u015farl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Hacettepe<br>\u00dcniversitesi Fen Fak\u00fcltesi Akt\u00fcerya Bilimleri B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, BNB Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k, Marmara<br>\u00dcniversitesi ve Ba\u015fkent \u00dcniversitesi&#8217;nin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131yla &#8220;TRH 2010&#8221; ad\u0131 veriler. &#8220;Ulusal<br>Mortalite Tablosu&#8221; haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f olup, Sosyal Kurumu\u2019nca da ilk pe\u015fin sermaye de\u011ferlerinin<br>hesab\u0131nda an\u0131lan tablolar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ek zarar hesab\u0131 \u00f6z\u00fc itibariyle<br>varsay\u0131mlara dayal\u0131 bir hesap olup, ger\u00e7e\u011fe en yak\u0131n verilerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 esast\u0131r. Bu<br>durumda di\u011fer kurumlar ile Yarg\u0131tay Daireleri aras\u0131nda tazminat hesab\u0131nda birli\u011fin<br>sa\u011flanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ve yine bu tablonun \u00fclkemize \u00f6zg\u00fc ve g\u00fcncel verileri i\u00e7ermesi de g\u00f6z<br>\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Dairemizce de 2020 y\u0131l\u0131 Aral\u0131k ay\u0131 itibari ile tazminat hesaplar\u0131nda bakiye<br>\u00f6mr\u00fcn belirlenmesinde TRH 2010 tablosunun esas al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcncellenen \u00fclke ger\u00e7eklerine<br>daha uygun olaca\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br><br>Buna g\u00f6re temyiz edenin s\u0131fat\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan karar\u0131n temyiz edilmedi\u011fi de dikkate<br>al\u0131narak, kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar g\u00f6zetilerek (tazminata esas al\u0131nan gelir, esas al\u0131nan asgari \u00fccret<br>y\u0131l\u0131, i\u015flemi\u015f\/i\u015fleyecek d\u00f6nem tarihleri gibi) davac\u0131n\u0131n ve deste\u011fin muhtemel bakiye ya\u015fam<br>s\u00fcresinin TRH 2010 Ya\u015fam Tablosu&#8217;na g\u00f6re belirlenmesi suretiyle tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n<br>hesaplanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bilirki\u015fiden ek rapor al\u0131narak olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmek \u00fczere<br>karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<br><br>Sonu\u00e7: Yukar\u0131da (1) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"40\"><li>Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 12.12.2019 tarih, 2019\/516-685 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,<br>(2) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131 vekilinin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n REDD\u0130NE,<br>(3) nolu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile \u0130tiraz<br>Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA, dosyan\u0131n saklama karar\u0131 veren \u0130lk Derece<br>Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan<br>harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden daval\u0131ya geri verilmesine 14.01.2021 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile<br>karar verildi. (\u00a4\u00a4)<br><\/li><li>HD. 14.01.2021 T. E: 2020\/2598. K: 34<\/li><\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindavada; deste\u011fin veya hak sahiplerinin bakiye \u00f6m\u00fcrleri, daha \u00f6nceki y\u0131llardaFransa&#8217;dan al\u0131nan 1931 tarihli &#8220;PMF&#8221; cetvelleri ile saptanmakta ise de; Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131kHazine M\u00fcste\u015farl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Hacettepe \u00dcniversitesi Fen Fak\u00fcltesi Akt\u00fcerya Bilimleri B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc,BNB Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k, Marmara \u00dcniversitesi ve Ba\u015fkent \u00dcniversitesi&#8217;nin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131yla&#8220;TRH 2010&#8221; ad\u0131 veriler, &#8220;Ulusal Mortalite Tablosu&#8221; haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f olup, SosyalKurumu\u2019nca da ilk pe\u015fin [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2053"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2053"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2053\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2054,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2053\/revisions\/2054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}