{"id":1963,"date":"2021-01-08T12:17:15","date_gmt":"2021-01-08T12:17:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/?p=1963"},"modified":"2021-01-08T12:17:16","modified_gmt":"2021-01-08T12:17:16","slug":"sirket-mudurunun-azli-yargitay-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/sirket-mudurunun-azli-yargitay-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"\u015eirket M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn Azli \/ Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

E. 2015\/6124<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

K. 2015\/13744<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

T. 21.12.2015<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

DAVA : <\/strong>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi’nce verilen 11.12.2014 tarih ve 2012\/214-2014\/417 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi davac\u0131lar vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup, incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

KARAR : <\/strong>Davac\u0131lar vekilleri, m\u00fcvekkillerinin …..’nin 1\/3 oran\u0131nda orta\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funu, \u015firketin m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6revinin 28\/01\/2011 tarihinde daval\u0131 …’e devredildi\u011fini, \u015firket m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc devralan …’\u00fcn 14\/04\/2011 tarihinde ….’nin fesih ve tasfiyesi i\u00e7in …. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi’nin 2011\/311 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda dava a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n ….’ye dair demirba\u015flar\u0131 satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sat\u0131lan gayrimenkullerin de\u011feri olarak 159.123,00 TL g\u00f6sterilip faturaya ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n muvazzal\u0131 bir sat\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu, s\u00f6z konusu demirba\u015flar\u0131n de\u011ferinin 800.000,00 TL miktar\u0131nda bulundu\u011funu, \u015firkete ait mallar\u0131 ….’ye satm\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, ancak e\u015fi ve k\u0131z\u0131 \u00fczerine kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan<\/strong> ….’ye devretti\u011fini ve halen bu \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u015firketin daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcd\u00fcr olmas\u0131ndan sonra zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, 20.000,00 TL zarar\u0131n daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen al\u0131nmas\u0131na, demirba\u015flar\u0131n …..’ye iadesine, \u015firketm\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>\u00fcn yetkilerinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Daval\u0131 … vekili, dava \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmedi\u011fini, derdestlik itiraz\u0131nda bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131, TTK 630\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca istenilen m\u00fcvekkilinin m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck yetkilerinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 isteminin k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli bir istem oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin demirba\u015flar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u00e7in davac\u0131lara davet yaz\u0131lar\u0131 yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak s\u00f6z konusu davetlere ra\u011fmen davac\u0131lar\u0131n bu sat\u0131\u015f i\u015fine ilgi g\u00f6stermediklerini, muvazaal\u0131 bir i\u015flemin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Daval\u0131 …. davaya cevap vermemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mahkemece, iddia, savunma ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, \u015firketin y\u00f6netilmesi a\u015famas\u0131nda daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131lar\u0131n \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bilgi verildi\u011fi, uyar\u0131lara ra\u011fmen davac\u0131lar\u0131n \u015firket y\u00f6netimi i\u00e7in al\u0131nan kararlara kat\u0131lmad\u0131klar\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n sahibi olduklar\u0131 hisse miktar\u0131n\u0131n \u015firketin \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funu te\u015fkil etti\u011fi, daval\u0131n\u0131n hisse miktar\u0131n\u0131n, \u015firket hisselerinin 1\/3’\u00fcn\u00fc te\u015fkil etti\u011fi, davac\u0131lar\u0131n sahip olduklar\u0131 hisse miktar\u0131 ile istedikleri zaman \u015firketin y\u00f6netimine m\u00fcdahale edebilecekleri ve gerekli kararlar\u0131 alabilecek imkanlar\u0131n\u0131n mevcut oldu\u011fu ancak davac\u0131lar\u0131n yetkilerini kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Karar\u0131 davac\u0131lar vekilleri temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dava, limited \u015firket m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>\u00fcn azli<\/strong> ve azli<\/strong> istenen m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong> \u015firketi zarara u\u011fratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla limited \u015firkete ait sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen mallar\u0131n iadesi ve davac\u0131lar\u0131n bu sebeple u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zararlar\u0131n tazminine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece, \u00f6zette a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, daval\u0131 m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong> dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin %60 oran\u0131nda orta\u011f\u0131olan<\/strong> davac\u0131lara \u00e7e\u015fitli defalar ihtar \u00e7ekmesine ra\u011fmen hareketsiz kalmalar\u0131 sebebiyle ve iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ispat edilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Davan\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fc\u015f bi\u00e7imi itibariyle, daval\u0131m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong> yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde ve muvazaal\u0131 olarak daval\u0131 \u015firkete sat\u0131lan mallar\u0131n iadesi ve davac\u0131lar\u0131n u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 iddia ettikleri zarar\u0131n tazmini ve daval\u0131 \u015firket m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>\u00fcn azli<\/strong> istenmi\u015ftir. \u0130ddialar\u0131n bu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fc\u015f bi\u00e7imi itibariyle mahkemece dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin mallar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firkete muvazaal\u0131 olarak sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve daval\u0131 m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong> yak\u0131nlar\u0131na ait dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firkete verildi\u011fi konusunda davac\u0131 delilleri getirtilip gerekirse bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131rmak suretiyle sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca, davac\u0131lar\u0131n taziminini istedikleri zarar\u0131n kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle, davac\u0131 ortak<\/strong>lar\u0131n do\u011frudan zarar iddias\u0131nda bulunup bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 belirlenip sonuca g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, bu konuda da eksik inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yine daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a derdestlik itiraz\u0131na konu olan<\/strong> 2011\/311 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131ndaki talepler ve taraf durumu incelenmek suretiyle de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, dosya getirtilmeksizin derdestlik itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddi de yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan bu sebeplerle davac\u0131lar vekillerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong>Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle davac\u0131lar vekillerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn davac\u0131lar yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, \u00f6dedikleri temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n istekleri halinde temyiz edenlere iadesine, 21.12.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\ufeffT.C. YARGITAY<\/p>\n\n\n\n

11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
E. 2015\/5893<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
K. 2016\/2550<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
T. 8.3.2016<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n

DAVA : <\/strong>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada…. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi’nce verilen 21.1.2015 tarih ve 2014\/744-2015\/53 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak incelenmesi as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f olup, duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 8.3.2016 g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015fkaca gelen olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yoklama ile anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131p haz\u0131r bulunan as\u0131l davada daval\u0131 … vekili Av. …. dinlenildikten sonra duru\u015fmal\u0131 i\u015flerin yo\u011funlu\u011fu ve s\u00fcre darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ileriye b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131. Tetkik Hakimi … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlenildikten ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

KARAR : <\/strong>As\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada davac\u0131 vekili, as\u0131l daval\u0131n\u0131n, birle\u015fen daval\u0131 \u015firketin m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u015firketin m\u00fcvekkili ile birlikte e\u015fit hisseye sahip bulunan di\u011fer orta\u011f\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fi oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131 \u015firket m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>\u00fcn m\u00fcvekkiline kar\u015f\u0131 etik olmayan ve kendisine duyulan g\u00fcveni temelden sarsan davran\u0131\u015flarda bulundu\u011funu, \u015firkete ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmedi\u011fini, \u015firket ortak<\/strong>lar\u0131na e\u015fit davranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck g\u00f6revini k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanarak \u015firketin i\u00e7ini bo\u015faltmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, as\u0131l daval\u0131 \u015firketm\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>\u00fcn, m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fckten azli<\/strong>ne karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As\u0131l davada daval\u0131 vekili, dava dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen hususlar\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n e\u015finin, \u015firketin orta\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fcvekkilinin e\u015fi olan…’e y\u00f6nelik hareketleri sebebiyle taraflar aras\u0131nda anla\u015fmazl\u0131k \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Birle\u015fen davada daval\u0131 vekili, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mahkemece, iddia, savunma ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 \u015firket m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>\u00fcn, birle\u015fen daval\u0131 \u015firketi iyi y\u00f6netti\u011fi, \u015firketin kar elde etti\u011fi, ihtilaf\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fi… ile \u015firketin di\u011fer orta\u011f\u0131 ve daval\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fi olan… aras\u0131ndaki anla\u015fmazl\u0131ktan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fckten azil i\u00e7in hakl\u0131 nedenlerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Karar\u0131, as\u0131l ve birle\u015fen davada davac\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1-) Dava, limited \u015firket m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>\u00fcn azli<\/strong> davas\u0131 olup, bu t\u00fcr davalarda husumetin azli<\/strong> istenen m\u00fcd\u00fcre y\u00f6netilmesi gerekli ve yeterli oldu\u011fundan daval\u0131 \u015firkete y\u00f6nelik birle\u015fen davan\u0131n husumet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fil ise de, birle\u015fen davan\u0131n reddine dair karar sonucu itibariyle do\u011fru bulundu\u011fundan HUMK 438\/son maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e ile onanmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2-)As\u0131l davaya y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gelince; Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 6102 Say\u0131l\u0131 TTK’n\u0131n 630<\/a>\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca her ortak<\/strong>, hakl\u0131 nedenlerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde limited \u015firket y\u00f6neticilerinin y\u00f6netim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve temsil yetkilerinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 mahkemeden talep edebilirler. Maddenin sonraki f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise y\u00f6neticinin, \u00f6zen ve ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k y\u00fck\u00fcm\u00fc ile di\u011fer kanunlardan ve \u015firket s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden do\u011fan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini a\u011f\u0131r bir \u015fekilde ihlal etmesinin veya \u015firketin iyi y\u00f6netimi i\u00e7in gerekli yetene\u011fi kaybetmesinin hakl\u0131 sebep olarak kabul olunaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda, mahkemece, her somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fine g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131klanan bi\u00e7imde azil i\u00e7in hakl\u0131 nedenlerin olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dava konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, as\u0131l daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc oldu\u011fu \u015firket iki ortak<\/strong>l\u0131 olup, e\u015fit hisseye sahiportak<\/strong>lardan birisi davac\u0131, di\u011feri ise as\u0131l daval\u0131 m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong> e\u015fidir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bankaya olan<\/strong> borcu, daval\u0131 m\u00fcd\u00fcr taraf\u0131ndan temlik al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, daha sonra da bu borcun tahsili i\u00e7in ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibinde davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu \u015firket hissesine haciz konulmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015f ve bu talep kabul edilerek davac\u0131n\u0131n \u015firket hissesi haczedilmi\u015ftir. Esasen davac\u0131n\u0131n iddias\u0131 da kendisine ait \u015firket hisselerinin, \u015firketin di\u011fer orta\u011f\u0131 ile onun e\u015fi olan<\/strong> daval\u0131 \u015firket m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ele ge\u00e7irilmek istendi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndedir. T\u00fcm bu hususlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, daval\u0131 m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>, \u00f6zen ve ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k y\u00fck\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc a\u011f\u0131r bir bi\u00e7imde ihlal etti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu itibarla mahkemece, as\u0131l daval\u0131 \u015firket m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn<\/strong>\u00fcn azli<\/strong> i\u00e7in hakl\u0131 nedenlerin olu\u015ftu\u011funun kabul\u00fcyle sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebeple bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Yukar\u0131da (1) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, davac\u0131 vekilinin birle\u015fen davaya y\u00f6nelik b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile sonucu itibariyle do\u011fru olan<\/strong> birle\u015fen davadaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn gerek\u00e7esi yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek ONANMASINA, (2) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, davac\u0131 vekilinin as\u0131l davaya y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle as\u0131l davada kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn davac\u0131 yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 bakiye 01,50 TL temyiz ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edenden al\u0131nmas\u0131na, 8.3.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. YARGITAY 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2015\/6124 K. 2015\/13744 T. 21.12.2015 DAVA : Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi’nce verilen 11.12.2014 tarih ve 2012\/214-2014\/417 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi davac\u0131lar vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1963"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1963"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1964,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1963\/revisions\/1964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cananergun.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}